Origins and history
Engineering analyses of critical transitions led to the question of how a system signals the loss of stability and correction capacity.
Explore the publication history →START HERE · Three sources before the archive
Follow the path from the engineering origins through early-warning mathematics to the BenchEWS Research Programme. The AIP result, the broader CRTI, and the software have distinct evidence statuses.
01 / How the ideas connect
Engineering analyses of critical transitions led to the question of how a system signals the loss of stability and correction capacity.
Explore the publication history →The AIP paper proves spectral concentration of Φ(Σ) for a defined model class. The broader CRTI is a separate experimental programme indicator.
See the AIP result →Lemming analogy: picture the critical edge →The research programme connects questions, models, benchmarks, evidence boundaries and validation. Studio implements selected parts as reference software.
Review evidence and maturity →02 / Research hierarchy
The scientific programme: questions, hypotheses, methods, evidence boundaries, and validation.
A specified diagnostic and measurement architecture within the programme. Its sonar language is metaphorical, not a hardware or product claim.
A computational reference implementation of parts of the programme. Software availability is kept separate from scientific validation.
03 / Core reading path
10.5281/zenodo.22726646↗2 · Programme logic10.5281/zenodo.21724459↗3 · Evidence and falsifiability10.5281/zenodo.22669876↗04 / Then continue
For methods, evidence matrices, software, and the full publication archive, continue only after the core path is clear.